Whisky: Bowmore
Saturday, September 23rd, 2006When I started this blog I promised it would be about mortality, decay, loss, exile, and single malt scotch.
Well, we’ve had frogs, lizards and varicose veins, so lets get on with the drinking.
Those of you unfortunate enough to see me regularly are already more aware than you could possible want to be that this year it has been my project to sample as many single malt scotches as possible, and I’ve been doing very well indeed.
This month’s single malt is 12-year Bowmore, which is pronounced with the stress on the second syllable and is an Islay, as eny fule kno. Of the Islay whiskies, I have previously tried Laphroaig, and three different expressions from Bruichladdich. This is my first adventure with Bowmore.
The scotch whisky business in parallel with the wine business has been getting its marketing and branding well honed in recent decades to make the product accessible to your regular punter. Presumably it is in the spirit of this marketability that Bowmore has put its own tasting notes on the label of the bottle. Saves me Googling what flavours I am supposed to be looking for.
The notes tell me that the nose is lemon, pears and honey.
OK. Let’s give it a go.
To be honest. all I got at first was the overpowering smell of peat and whisky. Then it occurred to me to take my nose out of the neck of the bottle and pour some into a proper glass where I could swirl it about and unlock the flavours. Good move, now I can smell something. Something sharp. I’ll call that lemon, though the idea didn’t spring at me without suggestion. For a moment there I had something rich and sweet but then it went away again. Meanwhile I was getting something like fruit that I could accept was pear.
However, I left a glass of the stuff on the table a while and when I came back to it, the odour was pure honey — no lemon or pear. Then I sploshed in a refill and got a snootfull of lemon, but neither of the other fragrances. Mind you, I spent my early adulthood shovelling uncut speed into my nasal passages, so it’s not surprising that they are less than reliable.
Luckily my palate is in better working order. Peat smoke and dark chocolate, the label tells me. I’ll happily go along with that. I haven’t personally smoked peat (or not knowingly) but I imagine this is what it would taste like. As for the dark chocolate, I had some 90 percent cacao once and I can see the connection in the rich dryness and the way the skin on the inside of the mouth tries to shrivel up and hide behind the tonsils.
Finish: long and complex. I’ll say. This is mixed propositions of Wittgenstein spiced with Bohm on the implicate order.
One thing they don’t mention on the label is that having had a thorough taste test, there is no way you will be able to think of a satisfying way to wind up a blog entry.
